(o, this uncertainty is taking me over)
Sep. 30th, 2010 10:22 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Eye exam tomorrow morning at nine-thirty. Grrrr. Definitely not looking forward to sporting my Tenth Doctor/Clark Kent specs or lacking my Edie Sedgwick-esque eye makeup. But I need an eye exam & more contacts quite badly, so sacrifices must be made, alas.
Damn, why don't I ever buy waterproof eye makeup? Waterproof eye makeup & defogger for my specs.
Screencapping continues to be a pain in my arse & there's a good chance that I'm just going to have to do it manually - screencapping is always nice, but doing it manually in VLC is such a drag - tedious, tiring & frustrating. But my caps just . . . vanish if I try to do it automatically, so if I want caps, I'll just have to do it all by hand. Ah, well. I've got some pretty subject matter to work with, so maybe it'll be less of a chore! It'll just take longer to get it all done.
& in less wah-wah-wah, I went skipping off to
fanmix in search of Zod/Tess mixes & whilst I came up empty-handed (booo!) for them, I found - & yes, I'm shocked that I'm even going with this; but crack is fun - a really nice Zod/Lois mix! (Again, my shock is almost immeasurable, but Pandora is wicked shippy if you liked those two. & the phone fakeouts & Salvation up until the phonebooth scene are also pretty shippy. I'd . . . read it? & okay, maybe ship it. But I'm too busy scheming on how to promote moar Zod/Tess to think of them.)
I alsoforced myself to sit through watched Superman II last weekend. It was . . . well, not my thing, but it was nice. & I thought the fortress of solitude looked really Gallifreyan in design, which amused me during all the dull bits, i.e., the non-Zod or Clark bits.
& you know, the weirdest thing? I came out slightly hearteyes for Clark Kent. But then again, I've never been overly fond of Superman - he bores me, actually, & I was a Batman girl as a child. But Clark? Awww! He gets me right in my heart because of that sweet awkwardness he has. I like cutely awkward sorts!
Hmm. I remember once talking with
nentari about how Sarah Jane Smith, in her early serials with Three, was very Lois Lane-esque herself, even in her wardrobe & overall look. I definitely saw that in the film & I sort of see it in Smallville!Lois too, even though I don't think she & Sarah are as much alike there. I think Smalliville!Lois is maybe a bit more Martha Jones-esque (especially in Pandora!) than Sarah-esque, but they're still a fair bit alike. But, hey, I loved Martha too, so it's a win-win situation all around.
& I'm pretty sure all of that preamble was just so I could mention how the Genesis song Me and Sarah Jane made me think of Clark & Lois without everyone thinking I'd lost my mind. (well, it sort of does! I think you just have to use your imagination to make it fit a bit.)
I went back to using my Twitter today at
wordsindreams' enabling suggestion, since she's using hers more lately. I'm riverdresses there as well, should you want to follow me! (I update way too much there; you've been warned)
Hmm. Sort of want to practise my eye makeup now in lieu of of being able to wear any tomorrow - I know some of it will stay on & make it look like I have some on, so I'd have more of a Nico-esque, rather than Edie-esque look.
Also, LJ fucked around with the tags again, & made it so that any tag with a slash is basically a broken link, so I have to start reorganising my tags soon. GAH, WHAT THE FUCK WAS WRONG WITH THE OLD SYSTEM, REALLY.
Edit: AAAAH OMG, THE MAKER OF SAID MIX MADE A BUNCH OF BEAUTIFUL ZOD & ZOD/LOIS ICONS FUCK YES! ::DANCES:: (It's been a bitch to find good, gorgeous, awesome Zod-centric icons. I DO NOT APPROVE. ::hisses:: brb, swiping & uploading all of them.)
Edit II: I forgot to add above, that after a little thinkythink (& seeing the Zod/Lois icons I flailed about above), I've come to the conclusion that Zod/Lois = Simm!Master/Martha, but somehow, not as squick-inducing for me. (I can read Simm!Master/Martha, but it kind of makes me uncomfortable & I've never figured out why.) Zod/Lois, on the other hand is just hot & twisted, & not like Zod/Tess - that's just evil & hot. So I could feasibly enjoy them more than I ever could Simm!Master/Martha. Go figure.
Damn, why don't I ever buy waterproof eye makeup? Waterproof eye makeup & defogger for my specs.
Screencapping continues to be a pain in my arse & there's a good chance that I'm just going to have to do it manually - screencapping is always nice, but doing it manually in VLC is such a drag - tedious, tiring & frustrating. But my caps just . . . vanish if I try to do it automatically, so if I want caps, I'll just have to do it all by hand. Ah, well. I've got some pretty subject matter to work with, so maybe it'll be less of a chore! It'll just take longer to get it all done.
& in less wah-wah-wah, I went skipping off to
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
I also
& you know, the weirdest thing? I came out slightly hearteyes for Clark Kent. But then again, I've never been overly fond of Superman - he bores me, actually, & I was a Batman girl as a child. But Clark? Awww! He gets me right in my heart because of that sweet awkwardness he has. I like cutely awkward sorts!
Hmm. I remember once talking with
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
& I'm pretty sure all of that preamble was just so I could mention how the Genesis song Me and Sarah Jane made me think of Clark & Lois without everyone thinking I'd lost my mind. (well, it sort of does! I think you just have to use your imagination to make it fit a bit.)
I went back to using my Twitter today at
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Hmm. Sort of want to practise my eye makeup now in lieu of of being able to wear any tomorrow - I know some of it will stay on & make it look like I have some on, so I'd have more of a Nico-esque, rather than Edie-esque look.
Also, LJ fucked around with the tags again, & made it so that any tag with a slash is basically a broken link, so I have to start reorganising my tags soon. GAH, WHAT THE FUCK WAS WRONG WITH THE OLD SYSTEM, REALLY.
Edit: AAAAH OMG, THE MAKER OF SAID MIX MADE A BUNCH OF BEAUTIFUL ZOD & ZOD/LOIS ICONS FUCK YES! ::DANCES:: (It's been a bitch to find good, gorgeous, awesome Zod-centric icons. I DO NOT APPROVE. ::hisses:: brb, swiping & uploading all of them.)
Edit II: I forgot to add above, that after a little thinkythink (& seeing the Zod/Lois icons I flailed about above), I've come to the conclusion that Zod/Lois = Simm!Master/Martha, but somehow, not as squick-inducing for me. (I can read Simm!Master/Martha, but it kind of makes me uncomfortable & I've never figured out why.) Zod/Lois, on the other hand is just hot & twisted, & not like Zod/Tess - that's just evil & hot. So I could feasibly enjoy them more than I ever could Simm!Master/Martha. Go figure.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-22 09:07 am (UTC)::looks like a sad kitty:: (Who needs Ten to have a happy life? :D) AWW!
::encourages you to stay positive::YES YOU CAN! DON'T BE DEFEATIST! ::DROOLS:: DO YOU THINK ZOD CARRIES ON THIS TRADITION, THEN?
WELL, KEEP DOING SO. I WOULD. O___o INDEED. ;___;
no subject
Date: 2010-10-22 09:56 am (UTC)*tries to comfort you with chocolate biscuits* (Indeed.) :D
*tries*I'M FEELING DISCOURAGED. I HOPE SO - HE'S THE PERFECT SOLDIER IN EVERY OTHER ASPECT.
I SHALL. THAT'S A TYPICAL REACTION FROM THEM, I'M AFRAID. D:
no subject
Date: 2010-10-22 07:42 pm (UTC)::iz a kitty and cannae have chocolate biscuits:: (I hope Donna has a lovely life.) ^____^
::pets you and has great faith in you::DON'T! THINK OF THE AMAZINGLY SMOULDERING SEXINESS OF ZOD & TESS & USE THAT AS YOUR ENCOURAGEMENT! ME TOO. I DO WONDER IF ONE CAN FIND OUT . . .
GOOD BUNNY. WAT. LITTLE DEMONS.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-23 05:25 am (UTC)*offers you salmon biscuits instead* (Me too.)
*puppy-dog eyes*I'M TRYING! I HOPE THERE'S A WAY.
:) TOLD YOU.
::eats those with gusto:: (She deserves it!) Aww, hi, berry!
I HAS IT! Oliver Queen interviews like a BADASS. Enjoy!TRY MOAR! ME TOO.
::REWARDS YOU:: THEY ARE. ::SHAKES HEAD::
no subject
Date: 2010-10-23 09:53 pm (UTC)*pets you while you eat* (Absolutely!)
Whoa. He is badass. It feels odd having an American Oliver, though...I'M TRYING TO TRY MOAR! I WONDER IF CALLUM WILL ANSWER IF ANYONE ASKS HIM ABOUT THIS. :P
\O/ ALAS.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-24 09:39 am (UTC)::purrs contentedly:: (YES!) ::braids her leaves::
SEE? OLIVER QUEEN INTERVIEWS LIKE A BOSS. But still, Tess > Oliver. :PKEEP TRYING TO TRY MOAR! YOU CAN ASK HIM THEN. I'LL BE THE ANGEL NEXT TO YOU. ::HALO GLOWS::
::PETS:: IS TRUE.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-24 02:29 pm (UTC)*is glad you're happy*
And comics!Oliver > Smallville!Oliver*I'M TRYING! I DON'T KNOW IF I'LL HAVE THE COURAGE TO MAKE THE QUESTION, Y'KNOW.
ETA: I have just finished listening to this week's episode of the Flashing Blade and my description of watching Androids of Tara with the twins wasn't read. :( From something they said at the beginning I think they recorded the episode a bit earlier than usual and thus my e-mail didn't reach them on time, so hopefully it will be read next week. Oh, and Tony said they are pondering doing the Companion Chronicles after all.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-26 07:36 am (UTC)::is delighted::
. . . I CANNAE ANSWER OR AGREE WITH THAT! :OYOU CAN DO IT! O, I BET YOU WOULD. ;D
::STROKES:: WOE TIMES TWO.
O, NO! :( But if they recorded it early, then maybe they'll read it next time! :D & YAY, COMPANION CHRONICLES!
no subject
Date: 2010-10-26 11:00 am (UTC)I UNDERSTAND.*KEEPS TRYING* I WON'T! *IZSHY*
Yeah, let's hope so. But since I've also sent them my review of the audio maybe there'll be some Patricia overload? (Or they'll postpone my review for when they tackle that audio, if they do so?)
no subject
Date: 2010-10-27 10:32 am (UTC)MEW!
SO YOUZ CHEATED. :P::HAS LOADS OF FAITH IN YOU:: YOU WILLZ!
::POKEY:: LOADS OF WOE!
Don't worry - everything will work out as it's supposed to, I think. (& maybe they will! I think they probably will, actually - it's perfect, predone feedback! :D)
no subject
Date: 2010-10-27 01:53 pm (UTC)I DIDN'T!*DOESN'T HAVE MUCH FAITH IN HERSELF* I WON'T!
Let's hope so. (Let's wait and see...)
no subject
Date: 2010-10-28 07:42 pm (UTC)MEOW?
YOUZ A CHEATIN' BUNNY!::HAS LOADS FOR BOTH:: YOU WILL!
::MOAR POKE:: CARTLOADS OF WOE!
::cuddles:: I will. ♥
no subject
Date: 2010-10-28 11:17 pm (UTC)HOW DID I CHEAT?*IS STILL VERY MUCH UNSURE* WHAT MAKES YOU SAY THAT?
*likes cuddles* (
no subject
Date: 2010-10-29 04:23 pm (UTC)OMG KITTY FACE!!
SAYING SUMMAT I CANNAE RESPOND TA!::MOAR LOADS:: BECAUSE I LIKE YOU!
::TICKLES HER:: HOUSELOADS OF WOE!
::loves you:: (Awwww, teddy! ::cuddles::)
no subject
Date: 2010-10-30 06:04 pm (UTC)THAT'S NOT CHEATING. HOW COULD I KNOW YOU COULDN'T ANSWER?*LOOKS AT YOU WITH DOUBT IN HER EYES* AW, REALLY?
*is happy* (
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-10-24 02:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-26 07:51 am (UTC)& I ADORE your review! You actually captured exactly what it was that made me love this story so much & also, interestingly enough, even though I don't know if you've heard it yet, why I adored Jo's Companion Chronicle, The Doll of Death. (They're not really similar, but they are at the same time - listen to both & I think you'll see what I mean, or not.) THEY NEED TO READ THIS, OMG.
::snugs you for writing such a lovely review::
no subject
Date: 2010-10-26 11:07 am (UTC)I'm so glad you liked it! I haven't listened to Doll of Death yet, but I have it and will listen to it as soon as I can.
(Speaking of Jo, the first part of her guest appearance in SJA aired yesterday and part 2 will be on tonight. I have part 1 already but haven't watched it yet, but I've heard of something someone says in it about another companion that has made me go "YAYOMGSQUEE!" I'll share it with you if you want to learn of it straight away, but keep mum if you want to wait. :))
Aww, I like snugs. :D
no subject
Date: 2010-10-27 10:34 am (UTC)O, do so! I think you'll really like it - it was one of my first Companion Chronicles & I LOVED it.
(EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEK, FINALLY!! Ummmmmm . . . is it a companion I adore?)
& you know I love to snug you! ^_^
no subject
Date: 2010-10-27 02:06 pm (UTC)I'm sure I will. :)
(Well, in Part 2 more companions and their post-show future got mentioned! I know you love the companion I was talking about and that you absolutely adore two of those that are mentioned in Part 2, so I'll keep mum until you feel like asking. But if you feel like knowing it all, I posted the exact quotes of what happened to all of them in my LJ. And Jo... oh, Jo. ♥ You know how I feel about RTD, but this time he made me happy - he did well to Jo and to everyone who got a mention.)
Hee. :D
no subject
Date: 2010-10-28 07:44 pm (UTC)You should listen to it now, since you saw her & Sarah together. :D
(OMG, WAS ONE OF THEM JAMIE OR POLLY? ::HOPPY:: & I'm glad to know he treated her with the respect she deserved. ♥♥)
I dooooooooooooo!
no subject
Date: 2010-10-28 11:22 pm (UTC)As soon as I can. My interview is tomorrow and I've spent the week prepping for it.
(MAYBE. I REFUSE TO SPOIL YOU WITHOUT PERMISSION. ONE THING I'LL SAY, THOUGH - MY FICS ARE STILL VALID! He also did some things that enraged fans, but the companion love (and especially the Jo love) was able to override it. Well, you can read some very sad implications between the lines of one thing that was said, but considering the actors in the show, it was inevitable.)
no subject
Date: 2010-10-29 08:45 pm (UTC)::kisskisskiss:: GOOD LUCK, MISS!
(YOU'RE A VERY GOOD FRIEND LIKE THAT, YOU KNOW! OMGGGGGG. WAIT, THIS GIVES ME AN IDEA. :O O no! ::wibble::)
no subject
Date: 2010-10-30 06:06 pm (UTC)Thankee. I think it went well.
(I'M GLAD YOU THINK SO, BECAUSE I'M ITCHING TO TELL YOU BUT I KNOW YOU WON'T THANK ME FOR IT. AND WHAT IDEA?)
ETA: This week's Flashing Blade podcast was released a day earlier, and I just heard it - and as we were hoping they've read both my letters! First, Tony read my account of watching Androids of Tara with the girls, and it was clear they both loved it, particularly the names they gave to the Doctors (before reading out the list, Tony told Bob "Brace yourself, because this is really good!"). Later, Bob read my review of Great Space Elevator, and the poor thing had to take a breather afterwards because of its length. I'm so evil to the poor boy. :P They had a nice laugh over my commenting back on the "Dastardly and Muttley" joke (and Bob did the Muttley laugh again!), and are now planning to make Jo do a Penelope Pitstop impression next time. As you can imagine, I'm quite happy!
Due to the recent RL events you're familiar with, I was unable to write anything for them so far and so I doubt I'll be able to do anything in time for next week, but I'll try to write about watching Unearthly Child and the S5 finale with the twins for the other week.
As for Professor Dave & Co, their podcast will very likely only be up at the usual time (late Sunday/early Monday), so I'll let you know about it once it happens. As I told you, when they do specials they tend to do a "part 2" 'cast the following week (they're a fortnightly 'cast), so if they didn't read my DLM tribute this week they'll either read it in Part 2 or leave it for an episode where they'll review it personally.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: